Facial Surgery · Guide

Deep plane vs SMAS:
what really changes
in your facelift

Two words you will hear in every facelift consultation, explained without medical jargon, with what the latest studies really say.

October 13, 2026 · By Dr. Jesús E. Chung, board-certified plastic surgeon (CMCPER No. 1794)

If you are researching a facelift, you have probably run into two words that sound like operating-room jargon: SMAS and deep plane. Some people present them as "the old technique" and "the new one". The reality is more interesting, and more useful to you.

In 30 seconds: both techniques work on the support layer beneath the skin. The deep plane goes a little deeper and moves the tissues together; the classic SMAS lift tightens that layer with stitches. Recent studies find good results and similar safety with both, and none has shown that one is better for everyone. What decides is your face.

First, what is the SMAS?

Picture your face as a coat: the skin is the outer fabric and the SMAS is the lining that gives it shape. It is a thin layer of fibrous and muscular tissue that wraps the muscles of facial expression and continues into the neck, where it joins the platysma muscle.3 Over the years that "lining" loosens and descends, and with it the cheeks drop, the jawline softens and neck bands appear.

That is why modern facelifts don't just pull the skin: they work on this layer, because moving it changes the skin, fat and muscles together.3

Two ways to reposition the support

What the studies say, in plain English

Practical translation: if someone tells you one technique is "the best" for everybody, the evidence doesn't back it up. What matters is that the technique is chosen for your face and performed by a surgeon who masters it.

So what decides which one suits you?

Your anatomy, not a trend. At the evaluation the surgeon reviews how much the cheeks, jawline and neck have descended; your skin quality and thickness; the shape of your face; your age and previous surgery; your health and, very importantly, what you hope to achieve. Dr. Chung performs facelift and neck lift surgery with the deep plane technique and explains at your evaluation whether it is right for you.

The risks, straight

Every facelift is surgery and carries risks: hematoma (blood collecting under the skin), temporary changes in sensation, scars, asymmetry and, because the surgeon works close to the facial nerves, the possibility of temporary weakness of a facial muscle.

How often does the nerve issue happen? An analysis of 45 studies and more than 10,000 deep plane patients found no permanent injuries and estimated temporary ones at about 1.2%.1 On the other hand, a survey of 150 US facial plastic surgeons reported temporary injuries in 1% to 5% of cases, more often with the deep plane.9 Figures vary between studies and with the surgeon's experience, and none is a promise for your case. Dr. Chung explains the risks in writing before surgery.

What to expect with Dr. Chung

Pocket glossary

SMAS: support layer beneath the skin that wraps the muscles of expression.

Platysma: thin neck muscle; when it loosens it forms "bands".

Plication: folding a layer onto itself and stitching it to tighten it.

Deep plane: technique that works beneath the SMAS and moves the tissues together.

Frequently Asked Questions

Your questions

That has not been shown. The 2025 reviews found comparable safety, and a survey of surgeons reported more temporary nerve injuries with the deep plane. The surgeon's experience matters more than the name of the technique.7,9

That has not been shown either. Studies with more than a year of follow-up find sustained satisfaction with both techniques, and a 2025 review found no longer duration with the deep plane.2,8

The goal is a natural result: looking rested, not operated on. The direction and tension of the tissues are planned for each face.

It depends on your case, the technique and the complexity, so no price is published. Your quote is given after the evaluation with Dr. Chung.

Only an evaluation can tell. You can start by sending your photos on WhatsApp, free and with no commitment.

Which option fits your face?

Your free WhatsApp photo evaluation with Dr. Chung is confidential and comes with no commitment. Our team replies in under 2 hours during business hours (Mexico time).

Request Free WhatsApp Evaluation Ask a Question on WhatsApp →

Evaluation & consultation

Photo evaluation by WhatsApp: free. Send your photos and questions; Dr. Chung reviews your case personally, with no commitment.

If you decide to continue, a consultation with Dr. Chung costs $1,000 MXN:

Procedure prices are quoted after the evaluation: every plan depends on your anatomy and your goals.

  1. Koroma P, et al. Deep Plane Facelifts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026;50(17):6874-6896. doi:10.1007/s00266-026-06138-x
  2. Khoury S, et al. The Deep Plane versus SMAS Facelift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(21):5895-5903. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-05118-x
  3. Ugradar S, et al. A novel variation of the suture suspension facelift. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(10):2542-2548. doi:10.1111/jocd.13307
  4. Barrett DM, Casanueva FJ, Wang TD. Evolution of the rhytidectomy. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2(1):38-44. doi:10.1016/j.wjorl.2015.12.001
  5. Wulu JA, Spiegel JH. Is deep plane rhytidectomy superior to superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication facelift? Laryngoscope. 2018;128(8):1741-1742. doi:10.1002/lary.27065
  6. Jacono AA, et al. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014;22(2):285-316. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2014.01.006
  7. Vayalapra S, et al. Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of SMAS and Deep Plane Facelift Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2025;95(5):582-589. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004454
  8. Schultz KP, et al. Demystifying Deep Layer Face-Lift Techniques: A Systematic Review of SMAS Techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;157(4):615-620. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012526
  9. Pak KY, et al. Evaluating Facelift Outcomes and Technique Trends in the United States. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;37(5):969-973. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000012210

General-information references from PubMed and the Wiley library. Study results are not a promise for an individual case and do not correspond to cases of Dr. Chung. This page is informational and does not replace a personal medical evaluation.

← Deep plane facelift & neck lift in Guadalajara